<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The new book from Karen Lisa Salamon</title>
	<link>http://dltq.org/2007/05/10/the-new-book-from-karen-lisa-salamon/</link>
	<description>a vlog by Raymond M. Kristiansen</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elskede</title>
		<link>http://dltq.org/2007/05/10/the-new-book-from-karen-lisa-salamon/#comment-5564</link>
		<dc:creator>Elskede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 08:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dltq.org/2007/05/10/the-new-book-from-karen-lisa-salamon/#comment-5564</guid>
		<description>I wonder what is really happening in the minds and spirits of those who like to criticize alternative spirituality, coaching, non-Western healing methods, psychological therapy/counseling etc (anything which lifts the human pirit, helps heal the heart and mind etc.). I wonder what good such negative criticism is doing? What is the purpose? In the books written criticizing coaching, the opinion against (topic)is clearly formed at the beginning and the text is simply an elaboration of subjective opinion, not a researched empirical study that cna then come to a conclusion. For example, Is there anything reporting on the harmful effects of coaching on people who have worked consistently and faithfully with a coach for a significant period of time on some issues? Does this book have such? It would be good to hear more about the contents of this book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what is really happening in the minds and spirits of those who like to criticize alternative spirituality, coaching, non-Western healing methods, psychological therapy/counseling etc (anything which lifts the human pirit, helps heal the heart and mind etc.). I wonder what good such negative criticism is doing? What is the purpose? In the books written criticizing coaching, the opinion against (topic)is clearly formed at the beginning and the text is simply an elaboration of subjective opinion, not a researched empirical study that cna then come to a conclusion. For example, Is there anything reporting on the harmful effects of coaching on people who have worked consistently and faithfully with a coach for a significant period of time on some issues? Does this book have such? It would be good to hear more about the contents of this book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
